Comments on: 014: Weapon X Origins

By: James Satterlee

James Satterlee — Thu, 29 Mar 2012 05:40:43 +0000

The whole idea of The Professor/Horton being a “Hudson” is ridiculous. The whole lineage of James MacDonald Hudson as presented in Wolverine: Origins is ridiculous. If James Hudson was born in the 1950’s (as the illegitimate son of the MacDonald woman…as I though they were going to do), that would have been fine with me. But instead, they went on and added extra generations, including The Professor. It’s as if the writers of Origins erased John Sublime and the entire Weapon X regular series from Wolverine’s history….NEEDLESSLY I might add. The only way to legitimately explain away this lineage mess is the fact that Nick Fury is “telling” Logan this information….it doesn’t appear in a flashback as the events of Weapon X series tend to do. Therefore, Marvel can technically say that Fury was lying, and that Sublime was behind much of this mess. AND that The Professor was a Horton, not a Hudson. Just my thoughts.

By: crazychris

crazychris — Mon, 25 Apr 2011 18:52:00 +0000

okay the professor was revealed to be logan’s distant couisin but was he born after world war 2 confusing too masny stories contradict each other. in the original weapon x seriers the professor had no knowledfge logan was a mutant until he wass told by whoever he was talking to john sublime was supposed to be on the phone one time. come to find out it was romulus.

By: BmanXman

BmanXman — Wed, 20 Oct 2010 23:19:23 +0000

Will the world ever know who Romulus is?

By: roleplaying games

roleplaying games — Fri, 23 Jan 2009 08:12:03 +0000

Personally I’m kind of tired of the Weapon X story line, especially after the Weapon Plus saga a few years ago. That is why I was happy when Origins came out and revealed there was another aspect to his mystery and past. I haven’t really enjoyed a Weapon X story in a long time, even the video games are all about the Weapon X stuff.